Archive for the ‘GAO Vehicle Report’ tag
Car Donations What the GAO Report Does NOT Tell You
When we discuss car donations, the Grassley Bill and the U.S. General Accounting Office (GAO) Vehicle Report of 2003 are a part of the discussion whether we mention them out loud or not. Both have had a major impact on public perception of our industry and on tax laws.
The U.S. General Accounting Office Report, which received a great deal of publicity, left the public with the idea that very little of the money raised by the sale of their donated car was ever going to make it into the hands of a charity. In the most noticeable example quoted in the report, the 2001 sale of a 1983 GMC truck was traced, showing it selling at auction for $375 and yielding just $31 to the charity.
Though the report focused on the tax deductions claimed for donors ($2,400 in this case), the underlying message was that something was amiss in the car donation world; i.e., why did the charity receive just $31 and why did this truck sell for just $375?
The U.S. General Accounting Office Report – perhaps unintentionally – painted everyone in the vehicle donation industry with the same greedy brush; it didn’t matter if you ran a fair organization, or not.
The study tracked 54 cases from car donation to charity contribution. Based on these cases, it stated that proceeds charities received from car donations “were generally considerably less than the amount donors claimed on their tax returns….” This discrepancy was the major concern to them, but what I noticed here was the second part of their finding: “…this difference is due in part to donated vehicles being often sold at auto auctions at wholesale prices, and processing expenses and third-party fees reducing the amount of proceeds charities receive.” (Page 15)
The Report also found that, “Charities or third-party agents typically sell donated vehicles through [wholesale] auctions.” (Page 14)
This tells me that few or none of the vehicles the GAO Report tracked were sold retail, meaning that most entered wholesale auto auction or salvage channels, regardless of their possible value to a charity and donor.
Let’s take the General Accounting Office example of the 1983 GMC truck. What if, instead of being sent directly to a wholesale auction, it had been sold at retail? An auto industry professional would have valued and sold the truck, if in reasonable condition, at (conservatively) $1,500 (lower than the claimed $2,400 but significantly higher than the $375!). So, what if, in addition, the car donation firm had given a fair portion of the sale to the charity?
The charity could have made somewhere in the neighborhood of $1,000 instead of $31. The car donor then would have been pleased with his legitimate tax deduction ($1,500) AND his charity donation. And that donor may have been back again in the future, bringing in another donation to this charity, and also telling friends, family and co-workers how well it went. Instead, though, the charity lost lots of money on the car donation, and it might have lost this disappointed donor forever, too.
We’re uniquely positioned as vehicle donation professionals to make sure that fairness flows in all directions. A big part of making this happen comes with making sure everyone in the process – from donor to charity – has all the information they need to make the best choices.
It’s time we as an industry opened our doors and windows – created transparency – so that donors know how much their vehicle sells for, how much goes to the cost of selling it, and how much (in dollar figures) ends up at their charity.
– The only way to change an industry is by example
Tim




